It's colors look so much better when graded in V-Log and the dual iso is really helpful. It has a new 10.2-megapixel Digital Live MOS Sensor, Venus Engine and Dual Native ISO technology, which combined together make it the most capable low-light Micro Four Thirds camera currently on the market. I might agree with you. In my experience, the A7SII and A7III are very similar in low light up until around ISO 52,200. I also liked the 10-bit for color correction and have the Metabones Speedbooster to make the cross factor closer to the Sony. Panasonic GH5S has external dimensions of 139 x 98 x 87 mm (5.47 x 3.86 x 3.43″) and weighs 660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz) (including batteries). A fourth-place finish among Sony sensors puts it ahead of the high-end a9, which features a similar 24MP sensor and comes in at 92 points. It has better autofocus and supposedly improved color than a GH5 and I can personally vouch that it's a great B-cam with the GH5. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony A7 III and Panasonic GH5 side-by-side from the … But sometimes I do not which the Sony can be really useful for. That's a great combo but keep in mind you are going to get vignetting when you move that combo over to the GH5s because the Sigma doesn't cover an APS-H field of view and the 5s has a reduced crop; actually uses the full m4/3 image circle in DCI 4K mode. I also want to buy one but already have 2 Panasonics - … I read through all of it and already knew most of what you said already, but the stuff I didn't know helped me out a lot. Philip Bloom put together a great low light comparison of the Panasonic GH5S, Sony a7SII, and Sony a7RIII cameras. I think it's from a lot of use since I been filming on it for a long time. This post has helped me a lot to understand the differences between the two cameras, yet I am unsure whether I should go with the GH5s or Sony - I am specifically thinking about overheating and camera durability, which I've heard is an issue with Sony cameras. I'm currently in the exact same boat. The GH5S is a camera which leans farther into the video capturing niche compared to the LUMIX DC-GH5, while the “S” in the new name stands for sensitivity – especially light sensitivity in low lighting that has been boldly billed as one of the main highlights of the camera. Has internal slow motion playback. Only when you over/undercrank with VFR, which I think is only an option in 8-bit 1080. Shoots 422 ProRes at 10-bit, allowing for insane color grading, Flip around screen for solo talking head videos / vlogging on-the-go, Perfect for corporate shoots and controlled lighting environments when manual focus is an option, Horrible, useless autofocus -- which could be limiting during vlogging where you can’t see what’s in focus as well on the screen, Low-light is subpar, unless adding on $600 speedbooster and then using APS-C or FF lenses (more expensive), Depth-of-field is far less apparent, unless adding speedbooster, Very fast autofocus, good for vlogging and run-n-gun, Very capable of capturing incredible professional-grade photos as well, considered “mixed-use”, Perfect for shoots that are more cinematic, have uncontrolled lighting, or lots of changing focus points. There are a few reviewers and sites claiming that the Panasonic GH5S beats the Sony a7SII at low light performance and I just don’t see it. /r/videography is a community for videographers of all skill levels in fields such as weddings, events, live performances, music videos, TV, corporate, live streaming, sports, real estate, YouTube, home videos and more. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Press J to jump to the feed. This applies to both the daylight and mixed light tests. Sensor. I would like to hear from you if you have one or the other or both. Sony A7 III was introduced to market in February 2018 and Panasonic GH5S was launched in January 2018. It's looking a bit dated, of course, but the upcoming Mk III will easily pull ahead of the GH5S in all metrics again. It's definitely usable (I've shot a short film in 8-bit V-log and have used 8-bit S-LOG a few times) but you will experience banding, difficult skintones (I've found 8-bit log often produces a corpse-like skintones). Number of available lenses is a big decision factor while choosing your interchangeable lens camera. The GH5S is slightly slower with a locking speed of 0.07s but it has better sensitivity in low light (-5Ev vs -4Ev on the GH5). The GH4 has always been a pretty noisy camera when you don't expose properly. It has better general image quality, more features, more compact body and offers more value for the money. Doesn’t do face tracking when shooting 4k on external monitor, In-body stabilization exists but isn’t comparable to GH5, though irrelevant on gimbal, Potentially overheats and has recording limit when shoots are over 30 minutes, the way you worded these bullet points seems completely biased against the gh5s, and seeing the tag next to your name, i can see why. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Image stabilization on Sony is not very effective in video, however AF is really good. It'll vignette like crazy unless you use super35/APS-C mode. I got it when I was in high school and it's now giving me issues. In this section, we rank and compare Sony A7 III and Panasonic GH5S for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas. So I'm sorry if this is really one sided. I saw a7iii video tests and can say im impressed. so full frame is out if you plan on continuing to use that lens. Imaging Resource compared the new GH5s vs the A7sII: “At both 12,800 and 25,600, the GH5S looks slightly better than the A7S II at the same ISOs, which is both unexpected and subjectively highly impressive for a camera featuring a sensor that is a fraction the size of the other. Just know that if you get the GH5S, you'll need to either switch to the 0.71x speedbooster or to full frame glass. There is only 2 months difference between A7 III and GH5S so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level. GH5S 12-35MM F2.8 lens, a7III 28-70MM F3.5-5.6, a6500 18-105MM F4. And it works perfectly with the INFERNO. It's more suited for this sort of work than the Sony is. Panasonic GH5s with my Metabones Speedbooster XL 0.64x VS. Sony A7 Mark III. Dual UHS-II SD card slots and of course V-Log. The GH5s has no problem filming low light video at 3200. Sensitivity tops out by default at ISO 51,200, where the GH5 had an … Appreciate it! Once again, you don't need full frame. low light - a7riii vs a7iii May 10, 2019 looking to find out how much better (if at all) the a7iii handles low light such as stage ballet productions versus a7riii. For low light comparison, I would do a Google search "GH5s vs A7iii low light". I own the GH4 and the GH5S, and I also have the DJI Ronin-M. A7s II: 169 contrast detection points. Sony A7 III: amazing autofocus, sensor image stabilization, 24 megapixel photos, 1080p at 120 fps, full frame. Another important factor is the availability of image stabilization. If the crop factor is something you can tolerate and if you dont need low light id say go for it. This technology is complex, but once the light is captured by the sensor’s pixels, it is then processed by two analogue circuits to a digital signal, rather than one circuit as with the GH5. Just a cost you'll have to keep in mind. A sensor significantly smaller than the full-frame A7S II is beating that camera in low-light performance. The Sony Alpha A7 III and the Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5s are two enthusiast cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February 2018 and January 2018. The A7 III can shoot up to 10fps with continuous AF. The GH5S blows the GH4 away in low light situations. Better low-light performance means you’ll be able to capture more with less. Buying both the GH5 and GH5s may not solve the problem at all - neither camera can do the handheld city nightlife shooting well since the GH5 has dual IS but lacks low-light performance and the GH5s has low-light performance but lacks dual IS. Has this always been an issue with you? Higher effective ISO. Sony A7 III, A7R III, A9 Low Light Settings. Here's the thing: The A7S II does have less noise in low light, but even then, I'd rather use the GH5s (to a point). The GH5S does deliver on it’s low light promise, even vs the best 4K full frame cameras. Low-light sensitivity, that is. Panasonic touts their newly announced GH5S as the low-light king, and just like with the Sony a7S (and a7S II) the S stands for “sensitivity”. After that, the A7SII appears to get noticeably better. I heavily researched both of these cameras and both cater to me very well. Low-light sensitivity, that is. Re: low light - a7riii vs a7iii In reply to brick33308 • 11 months ago Not any of the cameras you asked for, I shot an A7RII and an A9 quite much in low light club events and in other more normal light … You get excellent dynamic range at base SEO, and even when I’ve pushed the ISO upward, there has been a more than acceptable level of noise. Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sony A7 III and Panasonic GH5S. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison. Removing anti-alias filter increases the sharpness and level of detail but at the same time, it increases the chance of moire occurring in certain scenes. The ones I looked at mostly seem to have the FF camera on top (which is as it should be) though the GH5s does get a lot closer than it should. The gh5s actually has a significantly wider image than the gh4. The Sony a7III continues to get the typical praise of magically good low light performance, while still continuing to have menu issues. Sony A7 III has a 24.0MP Full frame sensor whereas Panasonic GH5S has a 10.0MP Four Thirds sensor. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Panasonic GH5S in all criteria. A measure of Panasonic's confidence in the GH5S' low-light chops can be seen in its ISO range. Like bad. I've shot, color corrected/graded, etc. Now with all that, I still can't decide which one to get. While both the cameras feature a Four Thirds sensors, the Panasonic GH5 has a 20.0 MP while the newer Panasonic GH5S has a 10.0 MP resolution. I’m curious how good exactly low light performance needs to get, because I was very happy with the last generation of cameras performance, from APS-C on up, but Sony continues to push the boundaries. Mostly will be paired up with my Sigma 18-35 lens or rented prime lenses. Compare Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S (10.3MP) vs. Canon EOS 6D Mark II (26.2MP) on sensor size (21.64mm vs. 43.18mm diagonal), pixel pitch, pixel density and other specs. On one side, the Sony has a full sensor out the box, amazing low light compatibility and has image stabilization with S-Log. I've been using this to film shorts in film school and it's been my life and savior. This technology is complex, but once the light is captured by the sensor’s pixels, it is then processed by two analogue circuits to a digital signal, rather than one circuit as with the GH5. I took notes and am using it in my final decision on my purchase. August 2, 2017 by Hugh Brownstone. The issues are that every ISO from 400-1600 is very noisy. The issues are that every ISO from 400-1600 is very noisy. By Xx123456xX, February 9, 2019 In: Cameras. Underlining the low light improvement, the GH5S offers a Dual Native sensitivity range. I think the gh5s has better color than the sony and the only thing that could bring me away from that is the bmpcc4k....but it seems like a headache to use, Wait for photokina at the end of the month, new cameras coming out that might beat these two. As the Panasonic GH5s mirrorless camera, is the the slightly more expensive and more professional video orientated sibling of the GH5. The low light sensitivity has also improved with -6Ev on the A7S model vs -3Ev on the A7 III (both measured at f/2). Both will suit you fine, but my money is on the GH5s. Very useful information! It goes from a 2x crop to somewhere around a 1.8x. So, from my experience, both cameras are great, but one camera, the a7III, feels like a great photo camera with video features. Panasonic GH5S and GH5 side-by-side. But a well lit Canon 60D will blow away a poorly lit Alexa or RED! Better low-light performance means you’ll be able to capture more with less. I heavily researched both of these cameras and both cater to me very well. In good light conditions, you generally want to keep your ISO level down for optimal file quality, then set the desired shutter speed and aperture according to the type of subject (still or moving), or effect (narrow or shallow depth of field). The A7 III delivers its best image quality at its base sensitivity of I… This might not be too big of an issue if most of what you’re filming is well-lit. There are 126 lenses for Sony A7 III's Sony E mount, on the other hand there are only 107 lenses for Panasonic GH5S's Micro Four Thirds lens mount. Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal) Built-in Bluetooth. On the other side, GH5s has a Micro 4/3 sensor. Additionally, the more robust resolution in the Sony a7R III offers enhanced image quality and a possibility to crop images to smaller dimensions while still preserving all the important details. Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. You can argue that the Panasonic GH5 is a litmus test, telling us at least as much about the people who love it or loathe it as the camera itself. Both the A7 III and the GH5s are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are based on a full frame (A7 III) and a Four Thirds (GH5s) sensor. Its a larger than normal four thirds sensor and gives a 1.8x crop factor. But I suggest you try the A7III and go for it haha. :-). Panasonic GH5S's 3.2 LCD screen is slightly larger than Sony A7 III's 3 screen. Below you can see the A7 III and GH5S sensor size comparison. Here is the back view size comparison of Sony A7 III and Panasonic GH5S. The video starts out with some pretty incredible low-light video footage that highlights the Sony a6400 video capabilities. Link to post Share on other sites. Sensitivity tops out by default at ISO 51,200, where the GH5 had an … Like bad. But with the speedbooster, it brings it close to the Sony but it's not a full frame. GH5S 12-35MM F2.8 lens, a7III 28-70MM F3.5-5.6, a6500 18-105MM F4. Again, the GH5 holds its own here. Sony A7 III was introduced to market in February 2018 and Panasonic GH5S was launched in January 2018. Yes, a full frame sensor helps but that is a HUGE difference in how many megapixels are crammed in. So it actually does get pretty close to FF with 1.3, but not quite. On one side, the Sony has a full sensor out the box, amazing low light compatibility and has image stabilization with S-Log. Guide: Autofocus Settings for Sony A7 / A9. Low-Light Performance. Sony A7 III has external dimensions of 127 x 96 x 74 mm (5 x 3.78 x 2.91″) and weighs 650 g (1.43 lb / 22.93 oz) (including batteries). Colorwise preference plays a big part […] Sony A7 III has a 24.0MP Full frame sensor whereas Panasonic GH5S has a 10.0MP Four Thirds sensor. Sometimes it's even noisy with a perfect exposure! Not a huge difference but it's there. Curious to hear if you pulled the trigger yet, and if so, how you're feeling with whichever of the two you decided on! How did Sony manage it? That's a result of the larger pixels and dual ISO on the 4K-optimized sensor. The Sony A7 III achieves an overall DxOMark sensor score of 96 points and ranks in the top five best Sony sensors we’ve tested, just behind the full-frame Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II fixed-lens compact camera, and the Sony A7R II. Both A7 III and GH5S have weather sealings in their body, making them resistant to water and dust. So I thought: before we put it up against the a7S II, I have to put it up against the original GH5. Youtube isn’t the best way to judge so he also made the files available via his dropbox here.I have to admit I go back and forth on a few of these shots, but I think I would really like to see this footage pushed a little more. It has a 10-bit color which is great for coloring. Thats almost a full frame field of view. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony A7 III and Panasonic GH5S side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Im not sure about gh5s for "low light" because its … 24 MP Panasonic GH5S vs Panasonic GH4: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) CMOS Sensor. If it was my choice, I would try both if possible and then pick myself on what works better for me. I already have a GH4, so I'm leaning more towards the GH5 with a speedbooster & Canon glass (plus keeping my old glass and batteries), but love that the Sony has low-light and great for photos as well. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image. Other times, I use gimbals to stabilize the camera and then again other times not. Before we get to the actual comparison part, let us first get the specs out of the way. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. Followers 1. Also if you know if I should wait for a *rumored* A7S III. Sony A7 III vs Panasonic GH5s. In our tests, we found the camera slower than those that use Sony’s hybrid AF – even in low light – despite the better sensitivity. Works with anamorphic lenses. There are also great things about the Sony like it's already a full sensor and is great in low light. And of course I know of the crop factor with full frame on my sigma 18-35, it's not a big issue to me. GH5 vs XT-3 vs A7III low light. Sony A7 III vs Panasonic GH5: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. Sports (low-light ISO) Noise levels have always been low on the A7, and so it is with the Sony A7 III. In this section, We are going to illustrate Panasonic GH5S and Panasonic GH4 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Here is a brief look at the main features of Sony A7 III and Panasonic GH5S before getting into our more detailed comparison. Gh5S Vs a7III Vs a6500 Night test All cameras 6400ISO auto WB 1/50 sec shutter speed Lenses did open on all cameras. And you can also shoot as long as your storage can hold instead of the time limit on the Sony. Panasonic GH5S and GH5 side-by-side. Its body is 12mm narrower, 2mm shorter and 13mm thinner than Panasonic GH5S. It delivers cleaner footage at this massive ISO level, than what the GH5 is able to deliver at ISO 6400 and the GH5s at 12800 ISO. I think I saw a youtube video just about it and it looked really well. The Sony monitor can only be tilted up and down, is slightly smaller (3.0”) with less resoluti… Beyond ISO 52,200 this becomes fairly dramatic. The GH5S is a camera which leans farther into the video capturing niche compared to the LUMIX DC-GH5, while the “S” in the new name stands for sensitivity – especially light sensitivity in low lighting that has been boldly billed as one of the main highlights of the camera. Granted under some lighting conditions the Panasonic GH5S looks better sometimes, but most of the time the Sony a7SII looks slightly more detailed. Find out where the GH5S wins! Combined with very fast lenses and a Metabones Speed Booster, and you could say it surpasses quite a few full frame cameras and all of Canon’s, even the 1D X Mark II and 1D C (which I will compare in a later post). Sony A7 III is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. To … Also included are the AF-C Custom Settings that allow you to fine-tune the AF behaviour on both products. One other difference between these two cameras that is worth mentioning is that Panasonic GH5S's sensor doesn't have an anti-alias (Low-Pass) filter. I think it's from a lot of use since I been filming on it for a long time. I just rented the GH5S and paired it with my GH4 and it was amazing! In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony A7 III and Panasonic GH5S side-by-side … I choose the GH5s more for a cinema/movie making camera for film school and professional work. The GH5S has a better lens selection. Very well organized too and you definitely know you're stuff! For the vast majority of filmmaking history Super 35 (APS-C) has been the standard. Sony A7 III vs Panasonic GH5s. Granted under some lighting conditions the Panasonic GH5S looks better sometimes, but most of the time the Sony a7SII looks slightly more detailed. So that S-LOG is pretty useless in 8-bit and generally pales in comparison to 10-bit log. The Panasonic Lumix GH5S is a new flagship compact system camera aimed at professional videographers. While the differences between the units may be subtle, the skin tones of the GH5S leaned more towards a red, true-color hue. Doesn't the GH5s have a good auto focus feature too? Concerning the rear screen, the GH5s comes with a multi-angle LCD that is 3.2” in size, has higher resolution (1,600k dots) and features touch capabilities. Screen only tilts down, requiring external monitor to see self when vlogging, costing another $400 min. Lots of features for the GH5s auto focus too. On the other end of the spectrum, the GH5S uses its ISO 2500 native setting to handle low-light images, which spans everything above ISO 800 all the way to the GH5S’ max ISO of 51,200. So I thought: before we put it up against the a7S II, I have to put it up against the original GH5. Combined with the GH4 is a Metabones Speedbooster XL 0.64x and my favorite lens, a Sigma 18-35mm Art for filming. On the other hand, Panasonic GH5S has a 10.0MP Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features Venus Engine 10 processor. I've used it with a ATMOS NINJA INFERNO. Maybe something is wrong with the sensor now, I'm not sure but I have enough money to upgrade to a better one. Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal) NFC. amazing low light compatibility and has image stabilization with S-Log. In this review, we will be comparing A7 III and GH5S, two Pro Mirrorless cameras from Sony and Panasonic. Higher effective ISO. 5. The Sony mirorrless cameras do an outstanding job at this low light ISO level. On the other side, GH5s has a Micro 4/3 sensor. Manny Ortiz is a favorite photographer of mine, and he just happens to have made a video discussing the low-light performance of the a6400.. Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. The GH5S is a camera which leans farther into the video capturing niche compared to the LUMIX DC-GH5, while the “S” in the new name stands for sensitivity – especially light sensitivity in low lighting that has been boldly billed as one of the main highlights of the camera. Sony A7 III vs Panasonic GH5S: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. Since Sony A7 III has a Full frame sensor and Panasonic GH5S has a smaller Four Thirds sensor, Panasonic GH5S's lenses for a similar focal length and aperture will generally be lighter and smaller than the Sony A7 III lenses.
2020 gh5s vs a7iii low light