< i> Realistic evaluation: by Ray Pawson and Nick Tilley, Sage Publications, 1997, 235 pp After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. The argument is developed using practical examples throughout and is grounded in the major fields of programme evaluation. Hello, would you like to continue browsing the SAGE website? Strategies and methods of realist evaluation 4. 5 The nature presentation and use of findings from realist evaluation. is a professor in the UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, Emeritus Professor of Sociology at Nottingham Trent University, and an adjunct professor at the Griffith Criminology Institute in Brisbane. Resources list on 'realist' evaluation Introduction Realist evaluation is a valuable method for addressing the complexity of social programmes. The authors lead us into their views of realist evaluation providing the history, and introducing case studies to explain different aspects of realistic evaluation. Brilliant boook. This holds important promise for achieving something that is devoutly to be wished: closer interaction among at least some researchers and some policy makers' - Eleanor Chelimsky, Past-President of the American Evaluation Association, `This is a sustained methodological argument by two wordly-wise social scientists. The book offers a complete blueprint for evaluation activities, running from design to data collection and analysis to the cumulation of findings across programmes and onto the realization of research into policy. I found Pawson and Tilley's latest work on evaluation an enjoyable and informative read. Top subscription boxes – right to your door, © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Unusually, it offers something for the academic, practitioner and student alike. It is the kind of book that clarifies your thoughts, even when you disagree with everything they say′ - Elliot Stern, The Tavistock Institute. We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 21, 2018, Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 19, 2013. Dalkin et al. It is articulate, occasionally eloquent and always iconoclastic, whilst eschewing "paradigm wars". It is the kind of book that clarifies your thoughts, even when you disagree with everything they say' - Elliot Stern, The … What a pleasure to read sentences like: "The research act involves "learning" a stakeholder′s theories, formalizing them, and "teaching" them back to that informant who is then in a position to comment upon, clarify and further refine the key ideas". Ray Pawson and Nicholas Tilley argue with passion that scientific evaluation requires a careful blend of theory and method, quality and quantity, ambition and realism. Pawson and Tilley are, for example, scathing about social con- structionist approaches that aim to describe multiple truths, arguing that within this paradigm relativist perspectives become mired in context.2We perceive that the gist of their argument is that, … The main body of this book is devoted to the articulation of a new evaluation paradigm, which promises greater validity and utility from the findings of evaluation studies. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation Bloodlines. For myself their `realistic evaluation′ clarified and formalised a jumbled set of ideas I had already been developing. Unashamedly intellectual, theoretically ambitious yet with a clear but bounded conception of evaluation. Pawson and Tilley argue persuasively and passionately that scientific evaluation requires a careful blend of theory and method, quality and quantity, ambition and realism. Unusually, it offers something for the academic, practitioner and student alike. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. Please try again. Evaluation 2002 8: 2, 157-181 Download Citation. The term ‘realist evaluation’ is drawn from Pawson and Tilley’s seminal work, Realistic Evaluation (1997). Critical realism is an important perspective in modern philosophy and social science, but it is largely absent in the field of healthcare research. Pawson and Tilley (1997) developed the first realist evaluation approach, although other interpretations have been developed since. Realist evaluations are based on a particular philosophy (realism). Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free. The reasons for the little terminological switch are, by the way, set down in the first page of that volume. Written by the authors most associated with RE, this piece describes the RE method in the context of regional blood donation practices. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Realistic Evaluation by Nick Tilley and Ray Pawson (1997, Trade Paperback) at the best online prices at … Pawson and Tilley camp. The voice is sometimes strident, but always clear. Claiming to be a “realist” can sometimes feel like choosing to bat on the side of the “good.” Too many people, in too many walks of life, have argued for their cause under the banner of “realism” for … It presents a profound yet highly readable critique of current evaluation practice, and goes on to introduce a `manifesto' and `handbook' for a fresh approach. ... Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. It is the kind of book that clarifies your thoughts, even when you disagree with everything they say' - Elliot Stern, The Tavistock Institute, `This book is a must for those engaged in the field, providing a fully illustrated text on evaluation with numerous examples from the criminal justice system. An Introduction to Scientific Realist Evaluation. The nature of programmes and how they work 2. The main body of this book is devoted to the articulation of a new evaluation paradigm, which promises greater validity and utility from the findings of evaluation studies. Pawson, by his own admission, does not claim that realist evaluation is perfect and mentions a number of difficulties that arise when trying to apply realist principles . The book offers a complete blueprint for evaluation activities, running from design to data collection and analysis to the cumulation of findings across programmes and onto the realization of research into policy. REALIST EVALUATION •Drawn from Pawson and Tilley’s ’Realistic Evaluation’ (1997) •Realism is a school of philosophy and sits between positivism and constructivism •A member of the family of theory-based evaluation approaches - start by clarifying the ‘program theory’ Well inhabit a world where few things are absolute out of their contexts. The book provides a really useful insight into evaluation and will be of use and interest to most students on the perspectives on social research course. SAGE Stock Take: Please be aware SAGE Distribution (including Customer Services) will be closed from 25th-30th November. Realistic Evaluation builds a rational evaluation paradigm from this context based view of efficacy and in doing so provides a rational counterpoint to those who want to misapply evaluation science in an effort to distill some ubiquitous and irrational concept of evidence based truth to a much too complex reality. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Realism's place in the policy cycle: formative, summative and synthetic approaches 5. The name reflects the paradigm′s foundation in scientific realist philosophy, its commitment to the idea that programmes deal with real problems rather than mere social constructions, and its primary intention, which is to inform realistic developm. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. The voice is sometimes strident, but always clear. Books include, SAGE Publications Ltd; 1st edition (June 23, 1997), Reviewed in the United States on August 31, 2019, Reviewed in the United States on December 27, 2012. `This is an engaging book with a strong sense of voice and communicative task. Realistic Evaluation shows how programme evaluation needs to be, and can be bettered. The realist approach, proposed in 1997 by the sociologists Pawson and Tilley [ 9 ], is increasingly attracting attention from researchers in evaluation [ 10, 11 ]. This is a useful resource for those venturing into program evaluation, particularly in the health field. highly recommend this to anyone seeking to evaluate services . What a pleasure to read sentences like: "The research act involves "learning" a stakeholder's theories, formalizing them, and "teaching" them back to that informant who is then in a position to comment upon, clarify and further refine the key ideas". Whilst you can still place an order during this time, you order will be held for despatch until after this period. Ray Pawson and Nicholas Tilley argue with passion that scientific evaluation requires a careful blend of theory and method, quality and quantity, ambition and realism. His academic work has been devoted to developing and delivering theoretically informed applied social science. (2015) succinctly summarized the version of mechanism promoted by Pawson and Tilley in realist evaluation work as “a combination of resources offered by the social programme under study and stakeholders’ reasoning in response” (p. 3). The years since the publication of Realistic Evaluation (Pawson and Tilley, 1997) and Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective (Pawson, 2006) have seen the Corresponding author: Ray Pawson, School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Ray Pawson and Nicholas Tilley argue with passion that scientific evaluation requires a careful blend of theory and method, quality and quantity, ambition and realism. Ray Pawson Nick Tilley. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in. The name reflects the paradigm's foundation in scientific realist philosophy, its commitment to the idea that programmes deal with real problems rather than mere social constructions, and its primary intention, which is to inform realistic developments in policy making that benefit programme participants and the public. The realist evaluation approach was first developed by Pawson and Tilley (1997) and has since been adapted in many different ways. I found Pawson and Tilley's latest work on evaluation an enjoyable and informative read. Unashamedly intellectual, theoretically ambitious yet with a clear but bounded conception of evaluation. bought to replace a text I had borrowed from a colleague. If you have not reset your password since 2017, please use the 'forgot password' link below to reset your password and access your SAGE online account. This holds important promise for achieving something that is devoutly to be wished: closer interaction among at least some researchers and some policy makers′ - Eleanor Chelimsky, Past-President of the American Evaluation Association, `This is a sustained methodological argument by two wordly-wise social scientists. In order to navigate out of this carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading. Although not everyone will agree with the methodology proposed by the authors, this book is a valuable read as it will cause most of us at least to review our methodological stance' - International Journal of Police Science and Management. Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. This book will be essential reading for all those involved in the evaluation process especially those researchers, students and practitioners in the core disciplines of sociology, social policy, criminology, health and education. It is the kind of book that clarifies your thoughts, even when you disagree with everything they say′ - Elliot Stern, The Tavistock Institute This chapter uses the tag ‘realist’ to describe the preferred approach, though it describes a strategy first set down in Pawson & Tilley’s Realistic Evaluation(1997). Am J Eval. The Pawson and Tilley "realist" call to arms threatens to take no prisoners among experimentalists, constructivists or pluralists. A realist evaluation of a safe medication administration education Programme. If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Basic concepts in the explanation and understanding of programmes 3. Notes on contributor. The nature, presentation and use of findings from realist evaluation 6. For more information contact your, Due to the current restrictions in place, our inspection copy policy has changed. Specific interests lie in evaluation methodology, the international crime drop, problem-oriented policing, and situational crime prevention, about all of which he has published extensively. There was a problem loading your book clubs. This shopping feature will continue to load items when the Enter key is pressed. Although theory-driven evaluation may not be associated with any particular ideology or philosophy , in their seminal work, Pawson and Tilley describe realist evaluation (RE) as an explanation-driven, generic approach to evaluation grounded in scientific realism .
2020 realist evaluation pawson and tilley